College of American Pathologists
CAP Committees & Leadership CAP Calendar of Events Estore CAP Media Center CAP Foundation
 
About CAP    Career Center    Contact Us      
Search: Search
  [Advanced Search]  
 
CAP Home CAP Advocacy CAP Reference Resources and Publications CAP Education Programs CAP Accreditation and Laboratory Improvement CAP Members
CAP Home > CAP Reference Resources and Publications > cap_today/cap_today_index.html > CAP TODAY 2012 Archive > Q & A
Printable Version

  Q & A

 

 

 

 

December 2012

Editor:
Fredrick L. Kiechle, MD, PhD

Question Q. I understand that the CAP Laboratory Accreditation Program recently announced that negative controls are no longer required for immunohistochemistry, but I’m still confused. Under what circumstances do I have to run negative controls?

A. The CAP anatomic pathology checklist item concerning the use of negative controls (ANP.22570) was recently revised, effective July 31, 2012, to eliminate the requirement for negative reagent controls in immunohistochemistry so long as the detection chemistry used does not rely on an avidin-biotin linkage. This would include detection products marketed as “polymer,” as well as “multimer.” Thus, if you are using newer detection reagents, negative reagent controls are no longer required. ANP.22570 discusses two types of negative controls for immunohistochemistry, so a little clarification may be warranted.

The first is the negative tissue control, and the second is the negative reagent control.

Negative tissue controls are those tissue elements in the reaction mixture that are expected to be negative. These negative tissue elements may be an integral part of the patient sample or may be added as “on-slide controls.” An example of the former would be lymphocytes in a tonsil being stained with a cytokeratin marker. When negative tissue controls appear to be staining positively, it is an indication of nonspecific reactivity, and appropriate remedial steps should be taken. Both positive and negative tissue controls are still required by the CAP and CLIA to assure that stains are working properly.

The negative reagent control is a replicate patient tissue slide in which the primary antibody is replaced with either another antibody of the same species and isotype or, in some laboratories, simply diluent. This slide is generally treated with the most aggressive antigen-retrieval protocol used among the various tests in a given case. This control is designed to indicate the presence of nonspecific binding of detection reagents due to the presence of endogenous biotin—as may be seen in a variety of normal and neoplastic tissues, most notably liver and kidney.

It is now recognized that the newer “multimer”- and “polymer”-based detection reagents are sufficiently free of background reactivity that a negative reagent control is not generally helpful. The CAP Immunohistochemistry Committee has concluded that the value added by routine use of a negative reagent control does not outweigh the cost in terms of labor, reagents and materials, space on staining instruments, and limited available diagnostic tissue. Use of a negative reagent control for all cases is not a CLIA requirement. However, a common-sense approach is required. Negative controls are indicated in cases where there is unexpected staining and should be added to such cases at the discretion of the pathologist.

References

1. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Quality assurance for design control and implementation of immnohistochemistry assays; approved guideline—2nd edition. CLSI document I/LA28-A2. Wayne, Pa.: CLSI;2003.

2. Bussolati G, Leonardo E. Technical pitfalls potentially affecting diagnoses in immunohistochemistry. J Clin Pathol. 2008;61:1188.

3. Ahrens WA, Folpe AL. CD1a immunopositivity in perivascular epithelioid cell neoplasms: true expression or technical artifact? A streptavidin–biotin and polymer–based detection system immunohistochemical study of perivascular epithelioid cell neoplasms and their morphologic mimics. Hum Pathol. 2011;42:369–374.

Regan Fulton, MD, PhD
Regional Immunohistochemistry Consultation Service
Kaiser Permanente Medical Center
San Francisco

Member, CAP Immunohistochemistry Committee

Question Q. Under what conditions would a patient have a normal red blood cell count (5.25 X 106/μL) but a low hemoglobin (10.1 g/dL) and a low hematocrit (32.9 percent)?

A. Normal RBC counts may be associated with a low hemoglobin and a low hematocrit in a number of conditions, including thalassemia trait and polycythemia vera (PV) with concurrent iron deficiency anemia. Both conditions are seen with a low MCV. In thalassemia trait, whether alpha or beta thalassemia, there is a structurally abnormal hemoglobin being made. Thus, patients with thalassemia trait have normal to elevated numbers of red blood cells, but, being microcytic and hypochromic, they have a low hemoglobin and a low hematocrit. Interestingly, in polycythemia vera there is an increase in red blood cell production that has escaped normal growth factor controls (that is, erythropoietin independent). In patients with adequate iron and polycythemia vera, this results in increased numbers of normocytic red blood cells and subsequent high hemoglobin and hematocrit. Such patients with polycythemia vera may rapidly deplete their iron stores with an unchecked production of red blood cells. Also in PV, some patients have gastrointestinal blood loss, another factor contributing to their iron deficiency. Thus, red cells from PV patients can become microcytic and hypochromic. While in uncomplicated iron deficiency anemia this results in decreased numbers of RBCs, in polycythemia vera complicated by iron deficiency anemia this may be seen as a normal RBC count, which is actually decreased for the patient.

References

1. Benz Jr EJ. Clinical manifestations and diagnosis of the thalassemias. In: Schrier S (section editor). Up to Date. www.uptodate.com/contents/clinical-manifestations-and-diagnosis-of-the-thalassemias. 2012.

2. George TI. Pathology of the myeloproliferative diseases. In: Greer JP, Foerster J, Rodgers GM, Paraskevas F, Glader B, Arber DA, Means RT, eds. Wintrobe’s Clinical Hematology. 12th ed. Philadelphia, Pa.: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;2009.

3. Pereira I, George TI, Arber DA. Atlas of Peripheral Blood. The Primary Diagnostic Tool. Philadelphia, Pa.: Wolters Kluwer, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;2012.

Tracy I. George, MD
Director, Clinical
Hematology Laboratory
Stanford University Medical Center
Stanford, Calif.

Chair, CAP Hematology/Clinical Microscopy Resource Committee
Member, CAP Council on Scientific Affairs


Dr. Kiechle is medical director of clinical pathology, Memorial Healthcare, Hollywood, Fla. submit your inquiries, or address them to Sherrie Rice, CAP TODAY, 325 Waukegan Road, Northfield, IL 60093; srice@cap.org.
 
 
 © 2014 College of American Pathologists. All rights reserved. | Terms and Conditions | CAP ConnectFollow Us on FacebookFollow Us on LinkedInFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on YouTubeFollow Us on FlickrSubscribe to a CAP RSS Feed