College of American Pathologists
CAP Committees & Leadership CAP Calendar of Events Estore CAP Media Center CAP Foundation
 
About CAP    Career Center    Contact Us      
Search: Search
  [Advanced Search]  
 
CAP Home CAP Advocacy CAP Reference Resources and Publications CAP Education Programs CAP Accreditation and Laboratory Improvement CAP Members
CAP Home > CAP Reference Resources and Publications > CAP TODAY > CAP TODAY 2010 Archive > Top eight deficiencies in workload reporting
Printable Version

  Top eight deficiencies in workload reporting

 

CAP Today

 

 

 

October 2010
Feature Story

In the experience of Dr. Robert Bredt, cytology laboratories subject to CAP inspection, when they are cited for deficiencies in workload reporting, are generally guilty of one of the following, roughly in order of frequency:

  1. Not keeping track of pathologist workloads for tasks requiring workload recording.
  2. Not prorating slides screened by cytotechnologists or pathologists screening for less than eight hours.
  3. Not having a method to record slides screened at another lab on the same day they are screening in the inspected lab.
  4. Not performing six-month evaluations to set workload limits for cytotechnologists.
  5. Not having a documented method to evaluate performance for No. 4 above.
  6. Not having an adequate way to record field of view (FOV) slides separately from full manual review (FMR) slides.
  7. Not accurately reviewing workload documents to catch cytotechnologists or pathologists who mistakenly occasionally go over the screening limits.
  8. Not always adhering to reduced screening rates for those who have been set to a lower rate during the every-six-months evaluation.
 

Related Links Related Links

       
 
 © 2014 College of American Pathologists. All rights reserved. | Terms and Conditions | CAP ConnectFollow Us on FacebookFollow Us on LinkedInFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on YouTubeFollow Us on FlickrSubscribe to a CAP RSS Feed