College of American Pathologists
CAP Committees & Leadership CAP Calendar of Events Estore CAP Media Center CAP Foundation
About CAP    Career Center    Contact Us      
Search: Search
  [Advanced Search]  
CAP Home CAP Advocacy CAP Reference Resources and Publications CAP Education Programs CAP Accreditation and Laboratory Improvement CAP Members
CAP Home > CAP Reference Resources and Publications > CAP TODAY > CAP Today Archive 2001 > Unfamiliar specimens
Printable Version



cap today

Unfamiliar specimens

July 2001
Karen Titus

Back to Cover Story

If a department starts to see a type of specimen that’s new to the practice, Dr. Ronald Sirota recommends a short-term revision to QA policy.

"Let’s say you start seeing stereotactic needle biopsies of the breast, and your pathologists are unfamiliar with that form of specimen," he says. "It might be a good idea to have at least one other pathologist review that type of specimen before they’re signed out, at least until the group gains experience.

"If you do it properly, you can increase group experience rapidly instead of slowly, since you’ll all be looking at many of the same types of cases in a relatively short amount of time," he continues. And when the group’s experience is sufficient, "you can simply drop the requirement."

When his practice began seeing spring-loaded prostate needle biopsies in the early 1990s, "We found those specimens to be very difficult," he recalls, mostly because of the drop in tissue volume. "We decided at least one other pathologist, if not more, had to look at these cases." The requirement was kept in place for well over a year, he says. "Now it’s optional."




 © 2014 College of American Pathologists. All rights reserved. | Terms and Conditions | CAP ConnectFollow Us on FacebookFollow Us on LinkedInFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on YouTubeFollow Us on FlickrSubscribe to a CAP RSS Feed