College of American Pathologists
CAP Committees & Leadership CAP Calendar of Events Estore CAP Media Center CAP Foundation
About CAP    Career Center    Contact Us      
Search: Search
  [Advanced Search]  
CAP Home CAP Advocacy CAP Reference Resources and Publications CAP Education Programs CAP Accreditation and Laboratory Improvement CAP Members
CAP Home > CAP Reference Resources and Publications > CAP TODAY > CAP TODAY 2004 Archive > Q and A
Printable Version

  PAP/NGC Program Review





cap today

January 2002

Q & A

Q.  The reference diagnosis from an aspiration biopsy of the lung is squamous cell carcinoma. Shouldn’t this smear be classified as unsatisfactory due to obscuring inflammation? We did not see malignant cells.

A.  The slide in question is from a cavitary lung lesion in a 55-year-old man. There is a heavy inflammatory background with necrotic debris as well as fungal hyphae. If you stop at this point and assume that you have found the cause of the lung cavity, you will have fallen into a classical cytology trap. Indeed, the cause of the cavity is a squamous cell carcinoma, which can be recognized by careful review. The error can be avoided by systematically evaluating each slide for adequacy, organisms, and cellular abnormalities. No specimen can be categorized as "unsatisfactory" if there are tumor cells, regardless of number.

1.  Neal MH, Kline TS. Distraction index: Part I—the elusive trich. Diagn Cytopathol. 1999;21:367-369.
2.  Schulte, MA. Distraction index: Part II: inflammation in nongynecologic cytology. Diagn Cytopathol. 2000;23: 149-150.

Mike Schulte, MD
Department of Pathology
St. Michael Hospital
Milwaukee, Wis.




 © 2014 College of American Pathologists. All rights reserved. | Terms and Conditions | CAP ConnectFollow Us on FacebookFollow Us on LinkedInFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on YouTubeFollow Us on FlickrSubscribe to a CAP RSS Feed