Planned System Maintenance

Surprise Medical Bills

Learn our policy recommendations aimed to relieve the anxiety patients experience from surprise medical bills.

Congress passed the No Surprises Act in December 2020. As legislation evolved over the years, the CAP worked with federal lawmakers and other physician organizations to improve this policy drastically. Notably, the final legislation included three provisions the CAP adamantly pushed for. This includes holding patients harmless, fair reimbursement for care (no initial benchmark rate and an arbitration system with batching and no threshold amount), and efforts to address network adequacy standards.

Implementation of the No Surprises Act

The federal government released a series of regulations in 2021 to implement provisions of the No Surprises Act. Prior to the publication of new regulations, the CAP urged the government to issue strong rules to prevent health insurance plans from manipulating the health care system. Read these specific details in the CAP’s letter to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

The federal government issued its first interim final regulation in July 2021 regarding patient-cost sharing protections, rules to calculate qualifying payment amounts, and more. The CAP submitted formal comments in response to the July regulations (read online here). Unfortunately, the government issued a second interim final regulation in September 2021 that gives insurance companies the upper hand during the independent dispute resolution (IDR) process where physicians and insurers can resolve payment disputes. The September regulations also detail requirements around providing a good faith estimate to uninsured or self-pay patients. Read the CAP’s formal comments to the HHS detailing the problems with the regulation and how the CAP proposed to fix it.

Finally, the CAP filed an amicus brief in support of a lawsuit that challenges the federal government’s flawed implementation of the No Surprises Act. In the amicus brief, the CAP warned that the government’s actions will cause substantial harm and further drive more physicians out of their patients’ health plan networks.

No Surprises Act Resources

Watch a CAP webinar recording (download the slides) with further details about the No Surprises Act’s regulatory requirements.

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) created a website with information for patients and physicians. The CMS Center for Consumer Information & Insurance Oversight also created this high-level summary for physicians and facilities and a more detailed training on the prohibitions on balance billing. Additionally, the AMA has published a toolkit for physicians and a guide on the IDR process.

Other Resources:

Good Faith Estimate Requirements

In addition to requirements related to balance billing, the No Surprises Act included provisions intended to protect uninsured (or self-pay) individuals from unexpectedly high medical bills. When a physician/facility schedules an item or service (such as a medical device, a doctor’s visit, or a surgical procedure), it must determine the individual’s health insurance status. If the patient has no coverage (uninsured) or does not intend to submit a claim to the plan/coverage (self-pay), the physician/facility must provide notification to the patient of the good faith estimate (GFE) of expected charges.

Importantly for pathologists, the GFE must include expected charges for the items or services provided in conjunction with the primary item or service. Specifically, a GFE provided to uninsured (or self-pay) individuals must include an itemized list of all items or services that are reasonably expected to be furnished for that period of care, grouped by each provider or facility. The interim final rules do not require the good faith estimate to include charges for unanticipated items or services that are not reasonably expected and that could occur due to unforeseen events.

In March of 2022, the CAP met with CMS to try and obtain clarification and further guidance around these requirements. As we expressed in an April 2022 letter, “we see no clear way to proceed in providing prospectively reliable estimates for pathology services, as pathologists are not the initiator of the tissue or fluids submitted for diagnosis, and will know neither what will be submitted nor what will need to be done until the pathologist has reviewed the original specimen(s) from each individual patient.” We hope to have additional information soon.

See this CMS guidance for additional information on the good faith estimate requirements as well as this FAQ about the good faith estimates.

The CAP also has a toolkit for members.

Frequently Asked Questions