1. Home
  2. Member Resources
  3. Articles
  4. Post-COVID-19 Blood Supply Challenges: Requests for Blood from Unvaccinated Donors

Post-COVID-19 Blood Supply Challenges: Requests for Blood from Unvaccinated Donors

The COVID-19 pandemic posed unprecedented challenges to the US blood supply. Blood collection activities were significantly impacted, and donor participation decreased due to social distancing measures and cancellation of voluntary blood drives in response to stay-at-home orders issued by local, state, and federal governments, leading to critical blood shortages.1,2 Despite these challenges, the US healthcare system demonstrated resilience and ensured the availability of critical blood supplies by adopting several measures. Hospitals reduced and/or canceled elective surgical procedures. Healthcare providers implemented patient blood management (PBM) initiatives to reduce avoidable transfusions. Blood donor centers increased collections by implementing enhanced safety protocols, scheduling appointment-only donations, increasing mobile blood drives, relying on regular donors, revisiting deferral criteria, and launching public awareness campaigns and community partnerships.3-6

Post-COVID-19, the blood supply status has generally stabilized but continues to face challenges due to fluctuating donor turnout, reduced school and business-based blood drives, and ongoing public health concerns. These issues compound long-term trends that already impact the nation’s blood supply, including declines in the overall number of individuals donating blood each year, fewer donors under the age of 50, and a lack of diversity in the donor pool.7,8

New Challenges: Requests for Blood from Unvaccinated Donors

The post-COVID-19 era has introduced a new challenge to the already strained blood supply: an increasing number of patient requests for blood and blood products from unvaccinated donors or those who have not had COVID-19.9-11 This refusal to accept blood from vaccinated donors is closely linked to widespread misinformation about COVID-19 and mRNA vaccines that polarized public opinion throughout the pandemic.12,13 The FDA and major US blood donation organizations issued multiple notices to counter medical skepticism and misinformation, aiming to reassure the public about the safety of the blood supply.14-18 However, public distrust persists and is further fueled by certain state governments introducing bills that could undermine donor anonymity and confidentiality, jeopardizing the blood supply for patients in need.19,20

Scientific Evidence on Transfusion Safety

Initially, concerns were raised about the potential for virus transmission via transfusion, but these were quickly dismissed as respiratory viruses, including SARS-CoV-2, are generally not transmitted via blood transfusion. There were no reported cases worldwide of SARS-CoV-2 being passed from donor to recipient.21-22 Nevertheless, skepticism continued, particularly regarding the potential adverse effects of transfusing blood from donors who received SARS-CoV-2 vaccines (COVID-19 vaccines), especially mRNA vaccines. Concerns included the potential for passive transmission of the vaccine through transfusion, alleged adverse events like myocarditis, and fears that circulating mRNA could cause changes in DNA, leading to oncogenic mutations, sterility, or birth defects.23 There is no evidence to support these concerns.24

COVID-19 mRNA vaccines were developed relatively recently, but mRNA vaccine technology has been studied for more than 15 years. Two of the four FDA-approved and authorized COVID-19 vaccines use mRNA. Current evidence indicates that after injection, the mRNA does not enter the cell’s nucleus and cannot interact with DNA. While vaccine components, including mRNA and SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antigens produced in response to mRNA vaccines, can be detected beyond the injection site for days after the injection at picogram levels, this is many orders of magnitude below what is initially injected (microgram levels).25 The FDA explicitly allows the collection of blood from donors who have recently received approved or authorized COVID-19 vaccines if they are healthy on the day of donation and meet all other eligibly criteria. Although fetal tissues were involved in previous mRNA vaccine research, they are not used in the production of available mRNA vaccines.26

The donor questionnaire ensures safe and effective blood donations by screening those who have recently received live vaccines. Since live vaccine viruses can replicate and presumably circulate after injection, donors recently immunized with live viral vaccines are excluded for an appropriate interval. Since the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are not live and cannot replicate SARS-CoV-2 virus in a donor, blood centers, in accordance with federal requirements and professional standards, do not defer donors based on vaccination status. As a donor’s COVID-19 vaccination status does not pose a safety risk for transfusion, it is not recorded and cannot be conveyed to hospitals, physicians, or patients. The FDA finds no current evidence to support concerns related to the safety of vaccinated individuals.27 Hence, recent requests for blood from unvaccinated donors are medically unfounded.

Strategies for Managing Requests for Blood from Unvaccinated Donors

Despite the absence of scientific evidence, requests for blood components from unvaccinated donors persist, fueled by misinformation propagated on social media and other mass communication platforms. As healthcare providers, it is crucial to adopt a non-judgmental, collaborative approach and involve patients in the decision-making process to address these concerns.

When faced with requests for unvaccinated blood, healthcare providers must be well-prepared to discuss the safety of the blood supply and address patient and family concerns. Providers should be aware of the widespread hesitancy against vaccinations, understand the concerns of patients who refuse transfusions from vaccinated donors, and be knowledgeable about the current lack of evidence for adverse outcomes in recipients of such transfusions.9,11

Educating patients about the safety of blood donation and transfusion is vital. This includes explaining the donation process, the blood supply chain, and the risks associated with demanding blood from specific donors. The current US blood donor screening process is rigorously regulated by the FDA, with additional accreditation by the Association for the Advancement of Blood and Biotherapies (AABB) and the College of American Pathologists (CAP). Blood centers are required to obtain a comprehensive medical and behavioral history from prospective donors and conduct infectious disease screenings for various pathogens. The risk of transfusion-transmitted infections is extremely low, and there is no evidence to suggest that SARS-CoV-2 virus can be transmitted through blood transfusion.21,22,28-31. Hence, the FDA does not recommend the use of COVID-19 laboratory tests for the routine screening of blood donors.15

Addressing Persistent Requests for Blood from Unvaccinated Donors

Despite efforts to adopt a non-judgmental, collaborative approach, some patients or families may persist in refusing blood from vaccinated donors and request blood from unvaccinated donors. In pediatric cases, it is crucial to recognize situations where family authority may need to be overridden to protect children from serious harm.9 In these settings, several options can be considered for patients and families requesting unvaccinated blood: 1) managing them as any other transfusion-declining patient, 2) offering autologous blood donation, and 3) addressing donation from directed donors.11

Each option has availability, safety, and cost implications. Healthcare providers should always use blood judiciously and implement Patient Blood Management (PBM), a patient-centered, systematic, evidence-based approach to improve patient outcomes by managing and preserving the patient’s own blood while promoting patient safety and empowerment.6,32 In certain settings and clinical conditions, and depending on the urgency, it is possible to optimize patients beforehand to completely avoid blood transfusions during treatment or procedures. Autologous donation, depending on the patient’s clinical situation, is not always an option. Autologous donations, if eligible, present numerous collection and logistical challenges. These collections are not feasible at every facility and typically require careful coordination with organizations such as the American Red Cross or other community blood donor centers to handle the collection, labeling, transportation, and tracking of these units in inventory.33 Directed donations, involving donors selected by the potential recipient, must meet all allogeneic criteria to undergo collection. Compared to volunteer donors, directed donations pose heightened safety concerns, including increased risks of transfusion-transmitted infections due to higher rates of positive infectious markers in first-time donors, transfusion-associated acute lung injury from the directed donation of maternal blood products, HLA alloimmunization, and transfusion-associated graft-versus-host disease. In the latter, allogeneic transfused T lymphocytes from directed donors escape detection and destruction because the host does not recognize the transfused lymphocytes as foreign due to HLA similarity.34-36

Healthcare providers should discourage requests for blood from unvaccinated donors and encourage patients to accept blood from the general inventory or offer PBM bloodless alternatives to transfusion. There is no scientific evidence demonstrating adverse outcomes from transfusions of blood products collected from COVID-19 vaccinated donors, and thus no medical reason to distinguish or separate blood donations from individuals who have received a COVID-19 vaccination. Accordingly, that information is neither collected nor labeled on blood products.

The legal guidelines regarding the obligation of a hospital to satisfy requests for autologous, directed donations, and other special accommodations are state-dependent. Reviewing hospital transfusion consent and updating hospital policies in conjunction with key hospital administration and legal departments regarding these issues is recommended.

In conclusion, as requests for blood from unvaccinated donors become more frequent, it is imperative for healthcare providers to develop a comprehensive policy that provides clear and consistent guidance. This policy must involve collaboration with all relevant stakeholders and be communicated effectively to both healthcare teams and patients. By doing so, healthcare institutions can ensure a unified approach to managing these requests, while maintaining the safety and integrity of the blood supply (Table 1).

Table 1: Key considerations for healthcare providers managing requests for blood from unvaccinated donors

Key Point

Details

Scientific Evidence on Safety

  • No evidence supports the notion that blood from vaccinated donors poses a risk.
  • COVID-19 mRNA vaccines do not interact with DNA and are not transmitted via blood.

Current Blood Donation Policies

  • Blood centers do not defer donors based on vaccination status.
  • Vaccine status is not recorded or conveyed in blood products.

Patient Education

  • Educate patients on the rigorous safety protocols in place.
  • Explain that blood donation processes are highly regulated to ensure safety.

Handling Requests for Blood from Unvaccinated Donor

  • Adopt a non-judgmental, empathetic approach.
  • Discuss the safety of the blood supply and address any misinformation.

Alternatives to Blood from Unvaccinated Donors

  • Consider autologous donations if clinically feasible.
  • Explore directed donations with the understanding of increased safety risks.

Legal and Policy Considerations

  • Review hospital policies on transfusion requests.
  • Understand state-specific regulations regarding patient requests and donor anonymity.

Communication with Patients

  • Be transparent about the limitations of fulfilling specific donor requests.
  • Discuss the implications and potential delays or increased costs associated with alternatives.

Focus on Patient Blood Management (PBM)

  • Emphasize PBM strategies to minimize the need for transfusions.
  • Promote patient-centered approaches to managing blood use.

References

  1. Basavaraju SV, Free RJ, Chavez Ortiz JL, Stewart P, Berger J, Sapiano MR. Impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic on blood donation and transfusions in the United States in 2020. Transfusion. 2023;63:S1-7.
  2. Riley W, Love K, McCullough J. Public policy impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on blood supply in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2021;111(5):860-6.
  3. Jacobs JW, Karafin MS, Allen ES, et al. Blood conservation strategies at United States hospitals during the COVID‐19 pandemic: findings from a multi‐institutional analysis‐International Society of Blood Transfusion survey. Transfusion. 2022;62(11):2271-81.
  4. Gehrie E, Tormey CA, Sanford KW. Transfusion service response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Am J Clin Pathol. 2020;154(3):280-5.
  5. Baron DM, Franchini M, Goobie SM, et al. Patient blood management during the COVID–19 pandemic: a narrative review. Anaesthesia. 2020;75(8):1105-13.
  6. Mathur G. Patient Blood Management Strategies During Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic. Open J Cardiol Heart Dis. 2022;4(1).
  7. America’s Blood Centers. Statistics and Public Messaging Guide. https://americasblood.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/U.S.-Blood-Donation-Statistics-and-Public-Messaging-Guide-Jan.-2024.pdf
  8. Gammon RR, Rosenbaum L, Cooke R, et al. Maintaining adequate donations and a sustainable blood supply: lessons learned. Transfusion. 2021;61(1):294-302.
  9. Kim DH, Berkman E, Clark JD, Saifee NH, Diekema DS, Lewis-Newby M. Parental refusals of blood transfusions from COVID-19 vaccinated donors for children needing cardiac surgery. Narrat Inq Bioeth. 2023;13(3):215-26.
  10. Jacobs JW, Bibb LA, Savani BN, Booth GS. Refusing blood transfusions from COVID-19-vaccinated donors: are we repeating history? Br J Haematol. 2022;196(3).
  11. Forkin KT, Guinn NR, Warner MA, Panigrahi AK. Addressing patient concerns with blood transfusion from donors vaccinated against COVID-19: A clinician primer. Anesthesiology. 2024;140(5).
  12. Aleccia J. Tainted blood: COVID skeptics are refusing life-saving blood transfusions from vaccinated donors. KFF Health News. https://www.thedailybeast.com/covid-skeptics-request-transfusions-from-unvaccinated-donors-to-avoid-tainted-blood?ref=home
  13. Pietsch B. New Zealand takes custody of baby whose parents refused ‘vaccinated blood.’ The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/12/08/new-zealand-baby-vaccinated-blood-antivax/
  14. Jacobs JW, Binns TC, Chooljian DM, et al. Blood bans and COVID-19: Government attempts to influence medicine and science threaten us all. Am J Clin Pathol. 2023;160(4):435-436.
  15. US Food and Drug Administration. Updated information for blood establishments regarding the COVID-19 pandemic and blood donation. 2022. https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/safety-availability-biologics/updated-information-blood-establishments-regarding-covid-19-pandemic-and-blood-donation
  16. Association for the Advancement of Blood & Biotherapies, America’s Blood Centers, American Red Cross. Joint statement: Blood community reiterates the safety of America’s blood supply for patients. Published 2023. https://www.redcross.org/about-us/news-and-events/press-release/2023/blood-community-reiterates-the-safety-of-america-s-blood-supply.html
  17. Association for the Advancement of Blood & Biotherapies. Vaccinations and blood donations. https://www.aabb.org/news-resources/resources/transfusion-medicine/vaccinations-and-blood-donation
  18. Frequently asked questions: Covid vaccines and blood donation. America’s blood centers. https://americasblood.org/one-pagers-faqs/frequently-asked-questions-covid-vaccines-and-blood-donation/
  19. State of Connecticut. An act concerning blood transfusions from unvaccinated blood donors. https://www.cga.ct.gov/2023/TO...
  20. Montana Legislature. An act revising laws related to the donation of blood and tissues; prohibiting certain donations of blood and tissues; providing a penalty; revising immunity provisions related to blood and tissue banks; creating an exemption from the prohibition on discrimination based on vaccine status for the screening and testing of blood and tissues; amending Sections 49-2-312 and 50-33-104, MCA; and providing an immediate effective date. https://leg.mt.gov/bills/2023/billhtml/HB0645.htm
  21. Shinohara N, Ito M, Kai K, et al. Risk of transfusion-transmitted infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 from blood donors in Japan. Transfusion. 2024;64(1):116-23.
  22. Ng SC, Chu AWH, Chan WM, et al. Re-examine the transfusion transmitted risk of SARS-CoV-2 virus during a major COVID-19 outbreak in 2022. Transfusion Medicine. 2023;33(4).
  23. Zimmerman RK. Helping patients with ethical concerns about COVID-19 vaccines in light of fetal cell lines used in some COVID-19 vaccines. Vaccine. 2021;39(31):4242-44.
  24. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Bust myths and learn the facts about COVID-19 vaccines. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/facts.html?s_cid=11760:covid%20vaccine%20facts:sem.ga:p:RG:GM:gen:PTN:FY22
  25. Ogata AF, Cheng CA, Desjardins M, et al. Circulating severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine antigen detected in the plasma of mRNA-1273 vaccine recipients. Clin Infect Dis. 2022;74(4):715-8.
  26. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Finding credible vaccine information. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/evalwebs.htm
  27. US Food and Drug Administration. Safety & availability (Biologics). https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/safety-availability-biologics
  28. Stramer SL, Notari EP, Zou S, et al. Human T-lymphotropic virus antibody screening of blood donors: rates of false-positive results and evaluation of a potential donor reentry algorithm. Transfusion. 2011;51(4):692-701.
  29. Zou S, Stramer SL, Dodd RY. Donor testing and risk: current prevalence, incidence, and residual risk of transfusion-transmissible agents in US allogeneic donations. Transfus Med Rev. 2012;26(2):119-28.
  30. Dodd RY, Crowder LA, Haynes JM, Notari EP, Stramer SL, Steele WR. Screening blood donors for HIV, HCV, and HBV at the American Red Cross: 10-year trends in prevalence, incidence, and residual Risk, 2007 to 2016. Transfus Med Rev. 2020;34(2):81-93.
  31. Steele WR, Dodd RY, Notari EP, et al. HIV, HCV, and HBV incidence and residual risk in US blood donors before and after implementation of the 12-month deferral policy for men who have sex with men. Transfusion. 2021;61(3):839-50.
  32. Shander A, Hardy JF, Ozawa S, et al. A global definition of patient blood management. Anesth Analg. 2022;135(3):476-88.
  33. Goodnough LT. Autologous blood donation. Critical Care. 2004;8:1-4.
  34. Dorsey KA, Moritz ED, Steele WR, et al. A comparison of human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis C virus, hepatitis B virus, and human T-lymphotropic virus marker rates for directed versus volunteer blood donations to the American Red Cross during 2005 to 2010. Transfusion. 2013;53(6):1250-6.
  35. Dunbar N, Cooke M, Diab M, et al. Transfusion-related acute lung injury after transfusion of maternal blood: a case-control study. Spine. 2010;35(23):E1322-7
  36. Dwyre, DM, Holland, PV. Transfusion‐associated graft‐versus‐host disease. Vox sanguinis. 2008;95(2):85-93.

Kamran Urgun, MD, is a third-year resident at the University of California Irvine Medical Center. Dr. Urgun earned his medical degree at Marmara University School of Medicine in Istanbul. He was a trained neurosurgeon before he moved to the US with his family. He decided to continue his voyage in pathology. He loves tea, music, getting lost in history books, museums and ruins, and walking with his wife. Kamran wants to continue his career in transfusion medicine and blood banking after completion of AP/CP training.

Gagan Mathur

Gagan Mathur, MD, MBA, CPE, FCAP, is a board-certified transfusion medicine/blood banking physician and serves as the medical director of transfusion medicine at the University of California, Irvine (UCI). Dr. Mathur holds the academic title of associate professor of clinical pathology in the Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine at the UCI School of Medicine. He pursued his master of business administration (MBA) from the University of Iowa Tippie School of Management, along with his clinical training in clinical pathology at the University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics. Dr. Mathur earned the title of Certified Physician Executive from American Association for Physician Leadership. Dr. Mathur’s areas of clinical interest and expertise include patient blood management, therapeutic apheresis, and cellular therapies. Along with his clinical responsibilities, Dr. Mathur is enthusiastically involved in clinical research and teaching to accomplish his academic commissions. Utilizing his interest and training in business management, informatics, and healthcare administration, Dr. Mathur strives to provide effective and efficient patient care.